🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from mediators to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions resume.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the forum, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always tried to dictate their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the primary answer to address disputes, but its standards, regulations and principles must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the face of this attack."